----------
---------------
-------------
*** Supreme Court
* It's time judicial tyranny ends: Chris Salcedo
* Rogue judges must be impeached: Chris Salcedo
--------------------
------- ????? ---------
------- ????? ---------
---------------------------
Unbelievable—Judge Boasberg, who’s blocking Trump from deporting violent gang members, also delayed the release of Hillary’s emails until after the 2016 election.
Now he’s coincidentally overseeing the Signal case too.
This feels totally rigged—
how is no one seeing this?
This guy is behind everything!
--------------------
-----------------------------
Plaintiffs cannot use these proceedings to interfere with the President's national-security and foreign-affairs authority, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to do so...
the Court should vacate the hearing and de-escalate the grave incursions on Executive Branch authority that have already arisen.
---------------------
-------------------------
----------------------
NEWSMAX
"Communist judges are issuing injunctions against President Trump because he is the first president to reassert the rule of law and constitutional order in this country."
* News 4 San Antonio
"Communist judges are issuing injunctions against President Trump because he is the first president to reassert the rule of law and constitutional order in this country."
* News 4 San Antonio
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Judges attempting to block Trump’s executive orders.
FULL STORY: https://bit.ly/4c0JlpC
FULL STORY: https://bit.ly/4c0JlpC
----------------------
* The President answers to the Constitution. The left would have us believe the President is subservient to these judges on issues of national security. Congress should write to the state supreme court and inform them that unless they sanction this activist judge they will remove the entire bench and all funding too.
* The DOJ might as well send similar letters to all the judges, particularly those who have already tried to obstruct the President’s constitutional authority.
BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is filing Articles of Impeachment this week against Judge James Boasberg who blocked President Trump from invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
The Obama appointed judge just ordered deportation flights carrying Venezuelan gang members back to Venezuela, to return to the U.S.
An activist judge is siding with criminal alien gangs who take over apartment buildings, murder, rob, assault, and r*pe Americans.
These activist judges need to be impeached.
Per NYPOST, HT Ian Jaeger & LOTT VIA X
---------------------------------
BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele responds to Judge James Boasberg who ruled that deportation flights to El Salvador must return back to the US.
“Too late.” @IanJaeger29
--------------------
Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts defended the rogue judiciary and slammed Trump’s call for impeaching judges in a rare rebuke on Tuesday.
Chief Justice Roberts said Trump call for impeaching judges is “not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS SIDES WITH ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNIST JUDGE WHO WANTS POTUS
TRUMP TO RETURN ILLEGAL MURDERS & RAPIST GANG MEMBERS TO U.S.A. TIME TO IMPEACH COMPROMISED ROBERTS WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE QUESTIONABLE FISA COURT.
TRUMP TO RETURN ILLEGAL MURDERS & RAPIST GANG MEMBERS TO U.S.A. TIME TO IMPEACH COMPROMISED ROBERTS WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE QUESTIONABLE FISA COURT.Teens for America First
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed
*Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC. [*strong probability McCord is active CIA]. McCord's husband, Sheldon Snook, was the key staff of Roberts and almost certainly the leaker of the Dobbs decision. Chief Justice Roberts had to hide that reality (which he did after the US Marshal investigation) because it put the leak inside his office. Boasberg knows this (and other stuff) and Roberts reacts to eyes on Boasberg from a defensive posture. Roberts is already obfuscating the issue...
- This isn't a "disagreement over a judge's decision."
- This is a "disagreement over a judge's authority itself."
Roberts ALLOWED his FISC to be defrauded. No accountability for the fraud = participation
Impeach Roberts...
----------------
DEMANDING INFORMATION | https://bit.ly/41Ev9hv
On the use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport 261 alleged criminals and gang members, there was a full-court press from the White House.
On Monday, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "They are actually foreign terrorists and alien enemies of the United States."And in an interview with Fox News Monday night, Attorney General Pam Bondi said "Our founding fathers knew exactly where they were doing in it applies to situations like this, Tren de Aragua are a foreign armed -- arm of the Venezuelan government. They are organized, they have a command structure and they have invaded our country. The murdering, they are raping at U.S. citizens and Donald Trump invoked the alien enemies act just like he should and he has gotten rid of them."
---------------------
-------------------
Read MORE: => https://bit.ly/43R90Pu
The federal judge who tried to block President Donald Trump’s deportation efforts has a history of stonewalling Trump’s immigration policies and spared one of the FBI officials behind the Russiagate hoax from prison.
Boasberg, an Obama appointee, hindered Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts in 2018 with a ruling that limited the administration’s ability to detain migrant families who had entered the country.
The judge’s ruling took aim at five Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers, preventing them from categorically denying parole to foreign nationals and effectively instructing the administration to release a greater number of migrants into the interior of the country.
The ruling undermined the administration’s attempt to discourage border crossings by detaining migrants rather than by rewarding them with release into the United States.
------------------
------------------
Fact check: True. Details in link.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/yugiWW6BkJNfstHwgPtHRQyFB
Yes, there is evidence that Judge James Boasberg, an Obama-appointed federal judge in Washington, D.C., sentenced numerous Trump supporters involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot to prison, including on charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), a statute related to obstruction of an official proceeding. Reports indicate he presided over approximately 70 January 6-related cases, often imposing prison sentences, even for non-violent offenses. The Supreme Court later addressed the use of this statute in Fischer v. United States (decided June 28, 2024), ruling that the provision applies only to those who impaired the availability or integrity of records, documents, or objects used in an official proceeding, or otherwise obstructed a specific investigation, narrowing its scope significantly.
This ruling led to the overturning or reconsideration of some convictions that relied on the broader interpretation of § 1512(c)(2) previously applied by judges like Boasberg. For example, posts on X and articles from sources like The Gateway Pundit claim that Boasberg sentenced individuals such as Sandra Weyer (14 months) and Sara Carpenter (22 months) under this statute, and that these convictions were among those affected by the Supreme Court’s decision. While exact numbers like "70" are cited in these sources, they are not universally verified across all references, and the precise number of Boasberg’s cases directly overturned by Fischer is unclear without a comprehensive case-by-case review. However, it is accurate that many January 6 defendants, including some sentenced by Boasberg, had their § 1512(c)(2) convictions challenged or vacated post-Fischer, aligning with the claim that his rulings were later impacted by the Supreme Court.
---------------------
* First, some want President Trump to ignore the judges’ orders. Afterall, they have no authority over the President, or his executive actions.
* Some want President Trump and Congress to impeach these judges for acting in violation of our national security.
* Some want President Trump and his DOJ to indict these judges for treason and have US Marshals perp walk them out of their courtrooms.
Ask them a few simple questions:
- Do you take bribes?
- Are you on the payroll of China and the CCP, or the Mexican Drug Cartels?
- Do you have offshore accounts?
- Are you benefiting financially from open borders, or drug trafficking? Is your spouse or family benefiting?
- Are you being blackmailed?
This is how we finally stop the politicians, judges and government bureaucrats from selling out the USA.
----------------
Trump legal team drops bomb, REFUSES to answer Judge when asked if any flights have left since the order was handed down.
"Those are operational issues and I am not at liberty to provide information."
In a fiery legal response, the Department of Justice blasted attempts by plaintiffs to interfere with President Donald Trump's national security and foreign affairs authority. The DOJ sharply criticized the plaintiffs, stating clearly, "Plaintiffs cannot use these proceedings to interfere with the President’s national-security and foreign-affairs authority, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to do so."
------------------------
As a federal district judge, I would not have the power to rule on the Alien Enemies Act in the sense of reviewing the president’s determinations under it. The Supreme Court has ruled that the act, specifically the president’s actions pursuant to it, is not a judicially reviewable issue. This conclusion stems from precedent, notably the 1948 case Ludecke v. Watkins, where the Court held that the president’s authority under the Alien Enemies Act to apprehend, restrain, or remove enemy aliens during a declared war is a matter of executive discretion and not subject to judicial review.
The Alien Enemies Act, enacted in 1798, grants the president broad powers during a declared war to deal with aliens who are citizens or subjects of a hostile nation. This could include actions like detention or deportation. The law is distinct from other wartime measures, such as the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II under Executive Order 9066, which applied to U.S. citizens and is not directly tied to this statute.
Supreme Court Precedent
In Ludecke v. Watkins, the Supreme Court addressed a challenge to the deportation of a German national after World War II. The petitioner argued that the war had ended, rendering the act inapplicable, but the Court deferred to the president’s determination that hostilities persisted. The ruling emphasized that such decisions are political judgments within the executive’s wartime authority, not suitable for courts to second-guess. This established that the president’s specific actions under the act are insulated from judicial oversight.
As a federal district judge, I am bound by Supreme Court precedent. The ruling in Ludecke v. Watkins means I lack the authority to review the merits of the president’s decisions under the Alien Enemies Act—such as whether an individual qualifies as an enemy alien or whether the action taken was appropriate. Even in cases involving procedural questions, like a habeas corpus petition, the Supreme Court has upheld this deference, as seen in Ludecke, where a habeas challenge was denied.
Could the Act Itself Be Challenged?
Theoretically, courts have the power to review the constitutionality of statutes, including the Alien Enemies Act. For instance, one might argue it violates due process under the Fifth Amendment. However, the act’s long history—over two centuries—and its acceptance in wartime contexts, combined with the Supreme Court’s deference to the political branches in national security matters, make it highly unlikely that such a challenge would succeed. The Ludecke decision implicitly upholds the act’s validity, further limiting a lower court’s ability to rule against it.
Interpreting the Query
The query’s phrasing—“would you have power to rule on the alien enemies act or as the scotus ruled that the act is not a judicial review able issue?”—is slightly ambiguous, possibly due to a missing comma. It could mean:
1. “Do I have the power to rule on the act, or has SCOTUS ruled it non-reviewable?” Here, the answer is that SCOTUS has ruled it non-reviewable.
2. “Do I have the power despite the SCOTUS ruling?” As a lower court judge, I am bound by precedent, so the answer remains no.
In either case, the outcome is the same: I do not have the power to rule on the president’s actions under the act.
Conclusion
Given the Supreme Court’s ruling that the president’s determinations under the Alien Enemies Act are not subject to judicial review, I, as a federal district judge, would lack the authority to rule on such matters. This limitation reflects the judiciary’s traditional deference to the executive in wartime national security decisions. Therefore, the answer to the query is clear: I would not have the power to rule on the Alien Enemies Act in this context.
------------------------
Bell County Texas Republican Party
This Judge Boasberg, who Blocked the deportation of Tren de Aragua gang member’s, never disclosed the fact that his daughter works for a 501c3 called “Partners For Justice” that gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice!
Thats right . The judges daughter gets paid, with your tax dollars, to protect foreign murderers, rapists and gang members from being deported !!!!
This goes far beyond conflict of interest.
-------------------
White House border czar Tom Homan defended the administration's decision not to comply with a federal judge's order to turn around deportation flights in the air on Monday.
Homan said that there would be "another flight every day" when asked about what's next for immigration efforts.
Read more: https://abcnews.visitlink.me/y2blTh
---------------
The Left’s Judicial Insurrection Against Trump Is a Constitutional Crisis — Here’s Why It Must Be Stopped by Jim Hᴏft Mar. 16, 2025
Since returning to the White House in January, President Donald Trump has been met with an unprecedented legal onslaught from far-left activist judges and radical groups determined to sabotage his administration at every turn....
These rogue judges—many appointed by Clinton, Obama, and Biden—have launched a relentless legal coup to undermine the will of the American people and prevent Trump from carrying out his constitutional duties.
Appearing on The War Room with Steve Bannon, Josh Hammer, Senior Counsel for the Article III Project, warned that what America is witnessing is no ordinary judicial activism—it’s a full-blown judicial insurrection.
------------------
* Judge orders return of two planes carrying Venezuelan immigrants to U.S. after Trump invokes Alien Enemies Act
The law has only been used three times in the country's history and is generating criticism from immigrant advocacy groups. DETAILS: https://voz.us/.../judge-orders-return-of-two-planes...
The law has only been used three times in the country's history and is generating criticism from immigrant advocacy groups. DETAILS: https://voz.us/.../judge-orders-return-of-two-planes...
After President Donald Trump linked the dangerous Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua with the Cartel of the Suns—a criminal organization led by dictator Nicolas Maduro and the second most important man in Chavismo, Diosdado Cabello—a judge ordered the return to the US of two deportation planes carrying Venezuelan immigrants who were on route to Central America.
US District Judge James Boasberg, an appointee of President Barack Obama, made the decision after President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act after equating the Aragua Train with a foreign government. The law has only been used three times in the country's history and is drawing criticism from immigration advocacy groups.
Boasberg's order was issued following a lawsuit filed on behalf of five Venezuelan immigrants, which was provisionally converted into a class action, Politico reported.
The judge's decision, for now, blocks the deportation of all illegal immigrants in custody in the country who are subject to Trump's Alien Enemy Alien Act proclamation.
“Any plane containing these folks that is going to take off or is in the air needs to be returned to the United States however that is accomplished,” Boasberg announced. “Make sure it’s complied with immediately.”
------------------
Hundreds of Venezuelans were deported Saturday, despite a judge’s order to stop the Trump administration from doing so. STORY: bit.ly/4heuqt1
* Hundreds of Venezuelans were deported Saturday, despite a judge’s order to stop the Trump administration from doing so.
* Trump says he invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to target members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which he says is "invading" the U.S.
* The Trump administration has not identified the migrants deported, provided any evidence they are in fact members of Tren de Aragua or that they committed any crimes in the U.S.
The Trump administration flew hundreds of immigrants to El Salvador despite a judge’s order temporarily barring them from being deported under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, the wartime declaration that President Donald Trump invoked Saturday.
------------------
-----------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment