----------
-----------------------
----------
* White House asks for judge to be removed from deportation case | Elizabeth Vargas Reports
-------------------------
*** WAYNE ROOT: Mr. President, Here is How to Stop Radical, Communist, Treasonous, Deep State “Resistance Judges” Dead in Their Tracks: Officially Declare War!
-----------------------------
--------------------------------
----------------------
Plaintiffs cannot use these proceedings to interfere with the President's national-security and foreign-affairs authority, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to do so...
the Court should vacate the hearing and de-escalate the grave incursions on Executive Branch authority that have already arisen.
--------------------
------------------
* 'BRING IT ON': Senator slams Dem judges' 'activist bench'
T.J. Moe
BREAKING: Attorney General Pam Bondi has filed a sharp rebuke in court, dismissing Judge Boasberg’s claim that the judiciary holds higher authority than the president on foreign policy matters.
T.J. Moe

“The underlying premise of these orders, including the most recent one requiring the production of these facts ex parte today at noon, is that the Judicial Branch is superior to the Executive Branch, particularly on non-legal matters involving foreign affairs and national security. The Government disagrees."
"The two branches are coequal, and the Court’s continued intrusions into the prerogatives of the Executive Branch, especially on a non-legal and factually irrelevant matter, should end." "What began as a dispute between litigants over the President’s authority to protect the national security and manage the foreign relations of the United States pursuant to both a longstanding Congressional authorization and the President’s core constitutional authorities has devolved into a picayune dispute over the micromanagement of immaterial factfinding."
"In a series of orders this Court has requested the Government to provide it details about the movements of aircraft outside of the United States and interactions with foreign nations which have no bearing on any legal issue at stake in the case."
"The Court’s pending questions relate to a comment by the Court to a Government attorney suggesting, incorrectly, that the attorney had the ability to divert aircraft..."
----------------------

---------------------
Donald Trump For PresidentBREAKING: Rep. Mike Collins says he will support Articles of Impeachment for Judge James Boasberg who blocked President Trump from invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
Every Republican needs to support this.
HT Ian Jaeger via X
-----------------------
BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is filing Articles of Impeachment this week against Judge James Boasberg who blocked President Trump from invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
The Obama appointed judge just ordered deportation flights carrying Venezuelan gang members back to Venezuela, to return to the U.S.
An activist judge is siding with criminal alien gangs who take over apartment buildings, murder, rob, assault, and r*pe Americans.
These activist judges need to be impeached.
Per NYPOST, HT Ian Jaeger & LOTT VIA X

He is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.
----------------------------
The White House Republican State AGs Back Trump on Tren de Aragua Flights; Judges 'Basically Supporting' Terrorists
"The judges are coloring way outside the law lines of their authority," South Carolina AG Alan Wilson tells Fox News.
FIRST ON FOX: A group of Republican state attorneys general is filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday afternoon, urging the circuit court to reverse a judge’s order blocking Trump from deporting alleged Tren de Aragua gang members, with one AG saying "the judges are basically supporting foreign terrorist organizations over the public safety of the American citizen."
The supporting court documents, led by South Carolina and Virginia Attorneys General Alan Wilson and Jason Miyares, respectively, are concerned that the judge's order – issued by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg – will contribute to crimes committed by violent illegal immigrants in their states.
----------------------------
Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts defended the rogue judiciary and slammed Trump’s call for impeaching judges in a rare rebuke on Tuesday.
Chief Justice Roberts said Trump call for impeaching judges is “not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”
Read https://tgpne.ws/RobertsDefendsJudiciary
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS SIDES WITH ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNIST JUDGE WHO WANTS POTUS



TRUMP TO RETURN ILLEGAL MURDERS & RAPIST GANG MEMBERS TO U.S.A. TIME TO IMPEACH COMPROMISED ROBERTS WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE QUESTIONABLE FISA COURT.





Teens for America First
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed
*Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC. [*strong probability McCord is active CIA]. McCord's husband, Sheldon Snook, was the key staff of Roberts and almost certainly the leaker of the Dobbs decision. Chief Justice Roberts had to hide that reality (which he did after the US Marshal investigation) because it put the leak inside his office. Boasberg knows this (and other stuff) and Roberts reacts to eyes on Boasberg from a defensive posture. Roberts is already obfuscating the issue...
- This isn't a "disagreement over a judge's decision."
- This is a "disagreement over a judge's authority itself."
Roberts ALLOWED his FISC to be defrauded. No accountability for the fraud = participation
Impeach Roberts...
-------------------
Stars Stripes & Coffee
Well another Democrat POS Chief Judge James E. Boasberg has ordered a plane full of gangs and terrorists illegal immigrants to turn around and come back. My thoughts are WHY IS HE PUTTING CITIZENS AT RISK? THESE JUDGES NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
Well another Democrat POS Chief Judge James E. Boasberg has ordered a plane full of gangs and terrorists illegal immigrants to turn around and come back. My thoughts are WHY IS HE PUTTING CITIZENS AT RISK? THESE JUDGES NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
* First, some want President Trump to ignore the judges’ orders. Afterall, they have no authority over the President, or his executive actions.
* Some want President Trump and Congress to impeach these judges for acting in violation of our national security.
* Some want President Trump and his DOJ to indict these judges for treason and have US Marshals perp walk them out of their courtrooms.
Ask them a few simple questions:
- Do you take bribes?
- Are you on the payroll of China and the CCP, or the Mexican Drug Cartels?
- Do you have offshore accounts?
- Are you benefiting financially from open borders, or drug trafficking?
- Is your spouse or family benefiting?
- Are you being blackmailed?
This is how we finally stop the politicians, judges and government bureaucrats from selling out the USA.
----------------
Judge Who Blocked Trump Deportations Has Daughter Who Works For A Pro-Illegal Migrant Organization.
Judge James Boasberg, who blocked President Donald Trump from deporting illegal migrant criminals and ordered two planes full of Tren de Aragua gang members to be turned around and brought back to the U.S. may have a major conflict of interest.
According to the investigations by Laura Loomer, Judge Boasberg failed to disclose the fact that his daughter works for “Partners For Justice” which is an organization that gives criminal illegal migrants legal advice.
The investigation reveals that the Judge's daughter Katherine Boasberg, works for Partners for Justice as a “capacity building associate".
Meaning she helps 'coordinate and administer grant activities, ensuring compliance, and supporting the delivery of capacity-building programs to strengthen nonprofit infrastructure.'
She focuses on criminal defense and advocacy.
"Partners for Justice strongly opposes mass deportations and legislation targeting members of criminal gangs, and has been a vocal critic of the Laken Riley Act."
It derives 76% of its funding from Government Grants, the report says
--------------------
------------------------
Donald Trump For President
* The
President answers to the Constitution. The left would have us believe
the President is subservient to these judges on issues of national
security. Congress
should write to the state supreme court and inform them that unless
they sanction this activist judge they will remove the entire bench and
all funding too.
* The DOJ might as well send similar letters to all the judges, particularly those who have already tried to obstruct the President’s constitutional authority.
------------------------Uhhhh wtf is he talking about. A US District Court Judges have been impeached and the last one was in 2010. Hardly two centuries …
Funny enough, Schiff and Cohen cosponsored the effort. I wonder if they think impeachment is a useful tool now
--------------------------
OAN Staff James Meyers
2:06 PM – Tuesday, March 18, 2025
A federal judge who temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s bid to rapidly deport Venezuelan gang members via the 18th century Alien Enemies Act is facing an impeachment push.
Just after the judge’s temporary order was issued, Representative Brandon Gill (R-Texas) announced plans to file articles of impeachment against the judge, which garnered praise from Tesla founder Elon Musk.
“Necessary,” Musk wrote on X after Gill revealed his plans to introduce articles of impeachment against the judge.
“The very worst judges – those who repeatedly flout the law – should at least be put to an impeachment vote, whether that vote succeeds or not,” Musk followed up in a separate post on X Monday.
---------------------------
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President
@realDonaldTrump
This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President
He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING! I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY. I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
------------------------

Bondi highlights immediately "the Court lacks the jurisdiction" to interfere with Trump's national security and foreign affairs authority.
They also say Trump's role as Commander in Chief is "not subject to judicial review or intervention."
In a significant legal response filed recently, the United States government firmly asserted its constitutional authority in matters of national security, particularly regarding presidential actions involving foreign terrorist threats. In a response to a lawsuit challenging President Donald J. Trump's national security proclamation, the Department of Justice argued persuasively that judicial interference with presidential powers in military and diplomatic matters poses significant constitutional problems.
The government's filing emphasizes that actions involving the removal of individuals deemed threats to national security fall squarely within the President's inherent Article II powers. It underscores established legal precedent, noting that judicial oversight in military or diplomatic operations abroad is both unprecedented and inappropriate. Quoting multiple Supreme Court rulings, the DOJ states clearly that presidential actions in such matters are constitutionally protected from judicial review.
Furthermore, the response clarifies misunderstandings related to the timing of recent flights involving removed individuals, pointing out that all actions took place before the court's injunction was officially issued. The government stresses the careful compliance with judicial orders while underscoring that ongoing operations and diplomatic efforts overseas remain beyond the purview of judicial restraint.
Ultimately, the DOJ's stance is a strong reminder that the separation of powers requires courts to avoid encroaching upon critical executive functions, especially during sensitive national security and foreign policy operations. Upholding the government's position here ensures not only the effective operation of executive authority but the broader integrity and safety of the nation.
------------------------
- Leading Report via X
By Tom Fitton
Many are asking if federal judges can be impeached as a consequence of judicial activism, deciding a case based on their personal preferences rather than what is stated in the Constitution, statutes, and applicable precedent and in usurpation of legislative and executive power. The answer is yes.
A series of extreme and activist decisions against President Donald Trump’s constitutional authority exercised through the Department of Government Efficiency and his appointees such as Elon Musk have brought the question to the fore.
But Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution unambiguously states, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”
In explaining what’s also known as the “vesting clause,” White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said,
* “A president is elected by the whole American people. He’s the only official in the entire government elected by the entire nation.
* Judges are appointed. Members of Congress are elected at the district or state level.”
As Miller put it, “The threat to democracy — indeed, the existential threat to democracy — is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime, tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for.”
--------------------
by Jim Hᴏft Mar. 16, 2025
Attorney General Pam Bondi has unleashed a blistering emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, demanding an immediate stay of an “outrageous overreach” by Obama-appointed District Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg.
The motion, filed early Saturday morning, accuses Boasberg of sabotaging the Trump administration’s national security agenda by issuing an “unauthorized” Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that blocks the removal of dangerous illegal aliens tied to the notorious Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA)—a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).
The explosive filing accuses Boasberg of acting without jurisdiction, without evidence, and without even hearing from the government—rushing to issue a 14-day TRO just hours after five anonymous Venezuelan plaintiffs filed a class-action complaint.
These plaintiffs, detained in Texas, claim they fear being wrongly swept up in Trump’s rumored plan to invoke the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to expel TdA members.
-----------------------
Statement from Attorney General Pam Bondi on Federal Judge Blocking President Trump from deporting Venezuelan gang members::
“Tonight, a DC trial judge supported Tren de Aragua terrorists over the safety of Americans. TdA is represented by the ACLU. This order disregards well-established authority regarding President Trump’s power, and it puts the public and law enforcement at risk. The Department of Justice is undeterred in its efforts to work with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and all of our partners to stop this invasion and Make America Safe again”
-------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment